/9918578/Banner

/9918578/Banner_2

/9918578/Mid

section

articleId

product

orgType

parrefer

accountID

Consulting

Banking

Accounting

Fintech

Internships

Rankings

Internship Rankings

Intern Resource Center

Explore Internships

Vault Law Home

Practice Area Resource Centers

Regional Resource Centers

Summer Program Resource Center

Vault Law Culture & Inclusion Survey

Vault Law

Guides

Events

Financial Services

Technology

Grad School

Work Relationships

Productivity

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Social Impact

Remote Work

Negotiating

Changing Jobs

Workplace Issues

Blog

Resume Samples

Cover Letter Samples

Interview Tips & Questions

A Day in the Life

International

Career Readiness

Explore Professions

Research Industries

Search Companies

Career Advice

Employers

Schools

Today&#39;s &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; ran an article entitled &quot;For Wall Street Workers, Ax Falls Quietly,&quot; highlighting&amp;nbsp;several large banks&#39; handling of layoffs in the wake of the credit crisis. As the title suggests, many bankers have been kept in the dark about their futures, not knowing if or when they&#39;ll be the next escorted to the door. The cuts have been so quiet that they&#39;ve been referred to as &quot;stealth layoffs.&quot; &lt;p&gt;Since last fall, when massive layoffs began to be announced, banks such as Citi, Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch have reduced headcount in several waves,&amp;nbsp;handing out&amp;nbsp;a few thousand pink slips one month, then a couple thousand more a few months later. For example, in late 2007, Citi said 17,000 employees would lose their jobs; in January 2008, the bank said 4,200 more would be cut; this past April, another 8,700 Citi bankers were ushered out. &lt;p&gt;Insiders quoted by the &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; say this tactic has been detrimental to employee morale, suggesting that a one-time announcement of all layoffs would be better for morale (assuming the extent of the layoffs is known beforehand). But would Citi announcing 30,000 cuts all at once really be better for morale? &lt;p&gt;Morale was hammered back when the tech bubble burst in 2002, and those layoffs came in larger waves. I remember one bank that, overnight, went from having some of the happiest insiders on Wall Street to some of the unhappiest (as evidenced in Vault&#39;s annual Finance Survey and Gold surveys). Other banks were hit hard, too. &lt;p&gt;It seems that massive layoffs will likely always hurt morale, irrespective of whether they&#39;re announced all at once or released a few thousand at a time, kept on the down low or sent in large blasts that can be seen coming miles away. &lt;p&gt;Perhaps the only way to truly minimize the affects of layoffs on morale is to minimize the layoffs themselves. &lt;p&gt;To that end, the &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; points out that banks generally pay 50 percent of their revenue to employees as salaries and bonuses, and that in 2007, that number jumped to 70 percent &quot;even as business began to dry up.&amp;#8221; &lt;p&gt;This is not unlike what happened in the months leading to the bubble bursting. Banks overhired and overpaid, and now they&#39;re paying for it again. In dollars and&amp;nbsp;cents&amp;nbsp;as well as&amp;nbsp;morale.&lt;/p&gt;

Derek Loosvelt

Article

Investment Banking Internships for Summer 2027 Are Open: How, When, and Where to Apply

MBA vs. CFA: Which Pays Off More for Banking and Finance Professionals?

How AI is Changing Careers in Banking and Finance

Where the Vault Fintech 100 Firms Are Headquartered

The Library